Vodyssey — Schedule Campaign Report

March 1–26, 2026 Facebook Ads API v22.0 Generated by Scarlett

Primary metric: Website Schedules (call-confirmed pixel). Excludes mk | lifestyle | creative (different funnel).

Total Spend
$63,140
4 schedule campaigns
Schedules
224
Website schedule events
Cost / Schedule
$281.88
Blended across all campaigns
Total Leads
8,846
$7.14 CPL blended
Lead → Schedule
2.53%
224 of 8,846 leads
Total Clicks
25,327
7.44% avg CTR

Campaign Comparison

Campaign Spend % Budget Schedules % Scheds Cost/Sched Leads CPL Lead→Sched Rating
mk | schedule | creative $25,849 40.9% 93 41.5% $277.95 801 $32.27 11.6% Best CPS
mk | schedule | optimal | fin $22,202 35.2% 79 35.3% $281.04 4,618 $4.81 1.7% Workhorse
mk | schedule | aux $8,313 13.2% 36 16.1% $230.92 1,392 $5.97 2.6% Cheapest
mk | schedule | creative | dudes $6,776 10.7% 16 7.1% $423.49 2,035 $3.33 0.8% Expensive

Cost Per Schedule by Campaign

aux
36 schedules $230.92
creative
93 schedules $277.95
optimal | fin
79 schedules $281.04
dudes
16 schedules $423.49

Ad Set Breakdown — Schedule Campaigns Only

Ad Set Campaign Spend Scheds Cost/Sched Leads CPL Lead→Sched
high ticket | iii | 2% creative $4,432 24 $184.65
high ticket | iii | 3% creative $6,923 21 $329.69
control | -sched [controls] - Copy optimal | fin $19,774 66 $299.61
control | -sched [branded] - Copy optimal | fin $2,428 13 $186.74
control | -sched aux $8,312 36 $230.89
high ticket | ii | 5% creative $3,391 11 $308.26
high ticket | i | 3% creative $1,296 8 $162.04
high ticket | iii | 1% creative $1,904 7 $272.06
high ticket | i | 1% creative $1,070 6 $178.38
high ticket | i | 5% creative $1,387 6 $231.10
high ticket | iii | 3% dudes $1,284 4 $320.90
high ticket | ii | 1% creative $1,327 3 $442.28
high ticket | ii | 3% creative $2,091 4 $522.79
high ticket | iii | 2% dudes $780 3 $260.09
high ticket | iii | 1% dudes $852 3 $284.05
sign | [wide] creative $1,419 3 $472.86

Showing ad sets with ≥3 schedules. Ad sets with 0-2 schedules omitted for clarity.

Top Performing Ads by Schedules

# Ad Name Ad Set Campaign Spend Scheds Cost/Sched
1 high income | lakeside ii - Copy control | -sched aux $4,683 28 $167.26
2 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | iii | 2% creative $3,699 23 $160.80
3 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | iii | 3% creative $4,759 16 $297.41
4 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | ii | 5% creative $3,133 11 $284.81
5 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | iii | 1% creative $1,823 7 $260.44
6 high income | client ii - Copy 2 high ticket | i | 3% creative $136 6 $22.59
7 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | i | 1% creative $960 6 $159.96
8 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | i | 5% creative $1,120 5 $224.04
9 high income | lakeside ii - Copy control | -sched aux $2,066 5 $413.15
10 high income | lakeside ii - Copy 2 high ticket | ii | 3% creative $1,625 4 $406.14

Top 10 ads by schedule count. "lakeside ii" creative dominates — it's the same ad running across multiple ad sets and campaigns.

Weekly Trend

Week Spend Schedules Cost/Sched Leads Lead→Sched
Mar 1–7 $15,933 56 $284.52 902 6.2%
Mar 8–14 $17,156 61 $281.24 1,783 3.4%
Mar 15–21 $16,707 58 $288.05 2,858 2.0%
Mar 22–26 (partial) $13,345 49 $272.36 3,305 1.5%

Funnel Analysis by Campaign

creative

Best Converter
Impressions118,009
Clicks7,366 (6.2% CTR)
Landing Page Views3,425
Leads801 (23.4% LPV→Lead)
Schedules93 (11.6% Lead→Sched)

🔥 11.6% lead-to-schedule rate is 4.6x the account average. Higher CPL ($32) but leads convert at a much higher rate — the quality is there.

optimal | fin

Volume Driver
Impressions152,572
Clicks10,919 (7.2% CTR)
Landing Page Views5,172
Leads4,618 (89.3% LPV→Lead)
Schedules79 (1.7% Lead→Sched)

📊 Generates the most leads at $4.81 CPL but only 1.7% convert to schedules. Massive top-of-funnel volume, weak bottom-of-funnel.

aux

Paused Week 4
Impressions33,220
Clicks3,019 (9.1% CTR)
Landing Page Views1,542
Leads1,392 (90.3% LPV→Lead)
Schedules36 (2.6% Lead→Sched)

Best cost/schedule at $230.92 but appears paused in week 4 ($0 spend). Was delivering consistently before that.

dudes

New — Watch
Impressions36,777
Clicks4,023 (10.0% CTR)
Landing Page Views1,907
Leads2,035 (106.7% LPV→Lead)
Schedules16 (0.8% Lead→Sched)

⚠️ Cheapest CPL ($3.33) and highest CTR (10%) but worst lead-to-schedule rate (0.8%). Lots of tire-kickers. $423/schedule is unsustainable. Only launched week 3 — may need more time to optimize, but the funnel quality signal is concerning.

Creative Analysis

The same creative ("lakeside ii") runs across nearly every ad set. Aggregating by creative name:

high income | lakeside ii
~120 schedules across variants $185–$297/sched

Dominant creative. Performs best in 2% lookalike ($160.80/sched) and aux control ($167.26/sched).

high income | client ii
~7 schedules $22.59/sched

Low volume but incredible efficiency. Only $136 spent for 6 schedules in one ad set. Worth scaling.

high income | client i
~5 schedules $140–$483/sched

Inconsistent. Some ad sets hit, others miss. Not enough data to be conclusive.

Key Insights & Recommended Actions

Creative Campaign Has the Best Funnel

11.6% lead-to-schedule rate is 4.6x the account average. Yes, CPL is $32 vs $5 elsewhere — but you're paying for quality. Each lead is 6.8x more likely to schedule. The math works: $277.95/schedule vs $281–$423 for the "cheap lead" campaigns.

Lead Volume ≠ Schedule Volume

Lead-to-schedule rate is declining weekly: 6.2% → 3.4% → 2.0% → 1.5%. Leads are growing (902 → 3,305) but schedules are flat (~55–61/week). The funnel is getting leakier — more top-of-funnel volume isn't translating to more calls.

Dudes Campaign Needs Time or a Kill

Best CTR (10%) and cheapest CPL ($3.33) but worst schedule rate (0.8%). Only launched week 3 with $1,958, then scaled to $4,818 in week 4 (getting 11 of its 16 schedules). Trending in the right direction but $423/schedule is still the most expensive. Give it one more week at current spend before deciding.

"client ii" Creative Is a Sleeper

6 schedules from only $136 spend = $22.59/schedule. That's 12x cheaper than the account average. Low volume so far — only running in one ad set (high ticket | i | 3%). Worth testing across more ad sets to see if it scales.

Priority Action Expected Impact
P0 Investigate the declining lead→schedule rate (6.2% → 1.5%). Check landing page, form flow, and nurture sequence for changes since March 1. Restoring to 4% would add ~40 schedules/month at current lead volume
P1 Test "client ii" creative in 3–4 additional ad sets (high ticket iii 2%, iii 3%, aux control). Currently only in one ad set. If $22.59/sched holds at scale, could 3–5x schedule volume from that creative
P1 Reactivate aux campaign — it was the cheapest at $230.92/schedule and went to $0 spend in week 4. Was delivering 11–13 schedules/week at best CPS. Lost ~10+ schedules this week.
P2 Within creative campaign: shift budget toward 2% lookalike ($184.65/sched) and away from ii | 3% ($522.79/sched) and sign [wide] ($472.86/sched). Could save $2–3K/month at same schedule volume
P2 Within optimal | fin: branded ad set ($186.74/sched) outperforms controls ($299.61/sched) by 38%. Test increasing branded budget share. Could lower blended CPS by $30–50 if branded scales
Data: Facebook Marketing API v22.0 Account: act_643543222721816 Period: March 1–26, 2026
Generated by Scarlett

Primary metric: Website Schedules (call-confirmed pixel event). Excludes "mk | lifestyle | creative" campaign (separate purchase funnel). Lead-to-schedule conversion rates may differ from Ads Manager due to attribution window differences.